Camden Labour Home Page Camden Labour Home Page
Home
Wards
Get Active
MPs
Feedback
Contact
Links
Mailinglist
Newsblog

Camden Labour Home Image

Archive for the ‘Services’ Category

Save our Sure Start

Posted on March 17th, 2010 by camdenlabour. Filed under Cuts, Local, Services, Somers Town.


Camden Labour is joining forces with families across the Borough in a campaign to Save Our Sure Start children’s centres from Tory plans to cut their funding and prevent access to these valuable services for families on middle and modest incomes. You can support the campaign at www.saveoursurestart.com.

Instead of the universal service Labour has created for all families, the Tories have said they would cut £200 million each year from the Sure Start budget – which could see one in five children’s centres being forced to close.

Read the rest of this entry »

.



Local IT centres hit by Tory/Lib Dem cuts

Posted on March 7th, 2010 by camdenlabour. Filed under Cuts, Kilburn, Local, Services.


Campaigners and users were dismayed at news that Camden Council Executive voted to plough ahead with cuts to UK online centres across the Borough.

Protestors outside Camden Town Hall

Labour councillors had urged the Lib Dems and Tories to not to proceed with a staggering 83% cut to the funding the council gives the centres, suggesting that they use the councils recession fund to at least guarantee fundingfor the coming year.

Read the rest of this entry »

.



Lib Dems back down in Rowley Way Radiators Row

Posted on January 6th, 2010 by admin. Filed under Housing, Local, Services.


Lib Dem led Camden Council has backed down from plans to replace the unique internal heating system on the Alexandra & Ainsworth estate with radiators, following a high profile campaign led by the Tenant’s & Resident’s Association – supported by Kilburn’s Labour Team.

Over 90% of residents surveyed by the TRA opposed the radiator plans, which many residents feared would be unsightly and could potentially lead to structural problems with the eye-catching grade II listed estate.

Labour campaigner Thomas Gardiner said: “Thanks to the TRA campaign, the Lib Dems have seen sense and backed down on their plans to impose radiators on the Alex & Ainsworth. We’re pleased the council has seen sense and will get on with replacing electrical wiring in new risers on A block, while looking again at sustainable longer term solutions for the estate.”

Tags: , , .



Labour opposition forces investigation into low pay at Camden Council

Posted on May 27th, 2009 by camdenlabour. Filed under Local, Services.


Labour and Green councillors secured a narrow victory in securing an investigation into low pay for cleaners, care workers and dinner ladies at Camden Council.  Despite opposition from ruling Lib Dem councillors, on the casting vote of the Labour chair of the Resource & Corporate Performance Committee the influential committee decided to press ahead with an investigation into the matter.
 
In a disputed decision, the Tory/Lib Dem run council will now research the issue of low pay at Camden Council in time to discuss the tendering of part-time worker contracts in July 2009. 
 
Cllrs Linda Cheung (Lib Dem, Hampstead Town) and Cllr. Nick Russell (Lib Dem, Kentish Town) voted against reviewing low paid contracts and the possibility of introducing the £7.60 an hour London Living Wage at Camden, while Cllr. Theo Blackwell (Labour, Regent’s Park) and Adrian Oliver (Green, Highgate) voted in favour.  The decision to go ahead with 2-2 was made by the casting vote of the Chair.  No Conservatives were present at the meeting.
 
Chair of the Committee and Opposition Finance spokesperson Cllr. Theo Blackwell said:
 
It doesn’t surprise me that the Lib Dems are against the London Living Wage, they also oppose the National Minimum Wage.”
 
The council outsourced residential caretakers and now wants to privatise Talacre sport centre staff.  They are doing so without a commitment to pay people a decent London minimum.  Everyone knows if you depress wages at the bottom it impacts on wages higher up the scale.  If you carry on like this pretty soon you’ll have a recruitment crisis, or no local people will be there to do these jobs.
 
It’s clear that the view from on high is that the council doesn’t want to open what it sees as a can of worms.  The council legal advice is suspect.  They say it can’t be done, despite other councils committing to this and the Mayor of London seeing the higher London rate as good morally good and for morale and productivity.
 
In the 2009 Budget Labour proposed an amendment to stop bonuses for senior council staff (totalling £300,000 a year) until the issue of low paid had been addressed.  They also argued against proposals that 3 Lib Dem backbench councillors should be paid an extra £5000 a year for their work.
 
Cllr. Blackwell added:
 
High wages and bonuses are no problem for the council, but when they consider low pay it suddenly becomes all to expensive.  Camden’s own figures for school cleaners, cooks and low paid carers show that this would cost £1 million, about 1% on council tax.  Last year Camden made a surplus of £13 million through cutting services and higher charges for the very services they continue to pay people poorly.
 
Background
1.  Research into low pay will be discussed at the July 21 meeting.
 
2.  The Resources & Corporate Performance Scrutiny Committee had previously discussed a report in October 2008 on the Council’s contracts to assess whether the London Living Wage is the minimum paid by the Council and it’s contractors.  This also examined whether there is a legal basis for Camden to ensure that contractors pay the London Living Wage and for a review of the performance of the cleaning contract, including health and safety issues, and to assess whether there was a correlation between lower rates of pay for staff and performance.  It was agreed, subject to the new Committee’s agreement in the next Council year, that the issue would be looked in more detail.      The Camden report stated that the National Minimum Wage is the minimum paid by the Council and its contractors, rather than London Living Wage.  Camden’s initial report gave the view that, based on a small sample of indicative figures, applying the London Living Wage as a contractual requirement would result in a financial impact which could amount to a 20% increase on costs on contracts or £1 million a year (approximately 1% on council tax).  Low paid Camden care workers, caterers and cleaners are currently paid more than £1 an hour under the London Living Wage. 
 
3.  The National Minimum Wage is set at £5.73 and the London Living Wage, called the “minimum acceptable quality of life in the city” by Boris Johnson is now set at £7.60 (a difference of 30% between the National Minimum Wage and the London Living Wage).  City Hall estimates that currently almost half (47%) all part-time staff working in London and 15% of full-time workers are still paid below the London living wage. One in seven London employees is paid less than £6.65 per hour.

Tags: .



Camden Lib Dems and Tories ditch 50% affordable homes target

Posted on November 18th, 2008 by theob. Filed under Housing, Services.


Camden’s commitment to 50% affordable housing is being ditched on the sly, say Camden Labour Councillors. 
 
New council development proposals are to introduce a new “sliding scale” of 10% to 50% to cover the amount of affordable housing required on developments of less than 50 homes – the vast majority of all developments in Camden.
 
The effect of this, warn Labour councillors, will be to reduce the amount of affordable homes required from developers and hamper attempts to reduce Camden’s massive housing waiting list.
In October Mayor Boris Johnson ditched Ken Livingstone’s commitment for 50% affordable housing.
The new Local Development Framework, currently being consulted on by Camden council, states under “Camden’s Preferred Development Policies” (Vol. 2, p.20):
“The Council is aware that the 50% affordable housing target cannot be delivered for schemes that are close to the threshold, and is unlikely to be deliverable for schemes which provide less than 3,500 sq m housing (approx 35 dwellings)…”
“The Council will take the following positive measures to bring forward schemes that reach or exceed the 10 dwelling threshold:
“The 50% target will operate on a sliding scale, subject to development viability, with a norm of 10% for 1,000 sq m (gross) of additional housing and 50% for 5,000 sq m (gross) of additional housing – considered to be sites with capacity of 10 dwellings and 50 dwellings respectively.”

Camden Labour said:
 
“The Council’s commitment to obtaining 50% affordable housing from new developments would be fatally undermined by this approach.  The Conservative/Liberal Democrat administration is watering down our access to new housing by this measure, and trying to cover it up in the smallprint.”
“This will reduce the council’s bargaining position with developers to get benefits for local people, who even more than ever will plead poverty in order to get the best deal for themselves.  Developers will rush to get fewer and fewer affordable homes, rather than more.”
“The vast majority of developments in Camden would be captured by this proposal.  If you think about the area south of the Euston Road, where space is so limited, we are most unlikely to get any affordable housing at all under this proposal – whereas, as we speak, there is a small development in Whitfield Street which is yielding 50% affordable housing on a site of 22 dwellings.”
 
Camden Labour is urging people to have your say on this important issue, write to Forward Planning, FREEPOST NAT15037, LB Camden, Town Hall Extension, Argyle Street, WC1H 8EQ.  Or e-mail to ldf@camden.gov.uk, or comment on the Camden website Camden.gov.uk/ldf.

 

 

 

 

Tags: , , .



Camden Labour calls for a new 8 point-plan to help local small firms

Posted on November 10th, 2008 by admin. Filed under Local, Services.


Camden Labour today called on the council to consider 8 extra steps to help local small businesses and local workers and traders in times of economic uncertainty.

Camden Council should:

For small firms and traders

1.   Pay all invoices from small firms within 10 days of receiving them in order to ensure that small businesses have the cash flow available to pay the wages of their staff.

2.    Reverse extra charges introduced last year for council-run markets.

3.    Suspend unpopular plans to hike ‘permission to park’ notices to local builders and plumbers.  This year charges went up from £9 to £33 – 267%.  These fees have force many tradespeople to pass cost on to consumers, slowing business.

4.    Camden should consult local businesses and unions on other measures it could take to help in this time of uncertainty.

For local workers

5.  Reduce barriers to work for parents by suspending higher charges for childcare in Children’s Centre’s and Surestarts in Camden’s most deprived areas, reducing barriers to work.

6.  Advertise jobs in the ‘Your Camden’ and local newspapers in order to attract applications from local residents.

7.  Re-invest in its once award-winning Welfare Rights Service, cut in 2006, and promote a major new benefits ‘take-up’ campaign on Camden’s estates and neighbourhoods, in association with the CAB and community groups to ensure that residents are getting the in-work benefits they are entitled to.

8.  Link up with the local police, PCT, Westminster Kingsway, UCL and LSE to offer more apprenticeships, training courses and work experience opportunities for local residents.  Target the scheme at Camden’s poorest areas, with the highest levels of unemployment.  There should also be more targeted work with communities with the highest jobless rate, such as the Bangladeshi and Somali communities.

Opposition finance spokesperson Cllr. Theo Blackwell said:

“The council is a major player locally and should be taking steps to help local traders and businesses.  Many of the extra charges Camden has introduced since since 2006, like the 267% hike to parking permits, are creatures of a different economic climate, and should be scaled back to help local traders.”

Tags: , , .



Labour demands reform of parking and music service charges

Posted on October 16th, 2008 by admin. Filed under Local, Services.


The numbers of people taking up Camden’s music service have decline due to an increase in charges, while residents who are moving or have building works done are being stung by a 267% increase in parking permissions charges.

In June Labour councillors on the Finance and Resource Committee asked council officers to look into the fees and charges regime.  The report, made available at the Resources Committee shows that taken together Camden has over 1000 separate fees and charges from 142 services.  In total the fees and charges budget of £85m for 2008/09 represents 9% of the £975m of budgeted income for the Council for that year, but over 30% of the annual spend.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , .



 
 

website by
Home | Newsblog | Local Issues | Wards | MPs | Feedback | Contact | Links | Mailinglist